In February 2024, Advent announced that it would merge its private Cohance Lifesciences into its listed Suven Pharmaceuticals, paying entirely in shares at 11 Suven shares for every 295 Cohance shares. There was no buyer and no cash. The merger took effect on May 1, 2025, leaving Advent with 66.7% of a ~$3 billion contract drug manufacturer whose results so far are a trough, not a triumph.
- When one owner sits on both sides of a merger, a share swap replaces cash and the swap ratio is the whole negotiation.
- Independent valuers PwC and BDO set the 11:295 ratio, backed by a fairness opinion, to protect Suven's public minority.
- Merging the private company into the listed one kept a public currency for later bolt-ons, NJ Bio and Sapala Organics.
- FY26 revenue fell 13% and Q1 FY27 fell 23%, so the platform is ambitious, expensive and unproven.
THE BIG IDEA
Advent owned two Indian drug-manufacturing companies, one listed and one private, and instead of selling either it merged them into each other. No cash changed hands; the private company's shareholders were simply handed shares of the listed one. The result is a single ~$3 billion contract manufacturer, planned from the day Advent first bought in.
Advent bought control of Suven Pharmaceuticals, a listed Hyderabad contract drug manufacturer, in December 2022, and separately held Cohance Lifesciences, a private API and specialty-chemicals maker, in its portfolio. In 2024 it merged Cohance into Suven through a share-swap scheme, 11 Suven shares for every 295 Cohance shares, creating a single listed CDMO platform worth about $3 billion in which Advent holds 66.7%. This is not a sale; it is a sponsor combining two of its own companies to build something neither could be alone. The listed Suven supplied a public currency and a stock-market listing; Cohance supplied scale and breadth. Then Advent kept building, bolting on an American ADC business and an oligonucleotide firm. It is an ambitious platform play, and, candidly, the early results have been a trough, not a triumph.
- The setup. Advent entered Suven in December 2022, paying ₹ 6,313 crore for 50.1% at ₹ 495 a share plus an open offer. The merger was announced in February 2024 as a scheme of amalgamation: Cohance's shareholders received new Suven shares at a fixed ratio set by independent valuers, and no money moved between the companies.
- In plain terms, a scheme of amalgamation: a court-approved merger in which one company absorbs another and the absorbed company's shareholders are paid in the survivor's shares rather than cash. Here the listed Suven survived, absorbed the private Cohance, and was then renamed Cohance Lifesciences.
- The move. Both sets of shareholders approved by roughly 100% in November 2024, the NCLT sanctioned it in March 2025, and it took effect on May 1, 2025. Suven was renamed Cohance Lifesciences, Advent held 66.7%, the public 33.3%. Advent then extended the platform, buying the US ADC specialist NJ Bio for about $100M and the oligonucleotide firm Sapala Organics.
- The point. Two lessons in one deal. For strategy: a listed portfolio company is a platform, not just a holding, and merging a private asset into it builds scale while creating a public currency for future deals. For deal-making: a share-swap merger between commonly owned companies moves no cash and needs no buyer, so the whole contest is the swap ratio, which is why independent valuers, not a negotiation, set it.
The deal at a glance
- ~$3B COMBINED PLATFORM VALUE
- 66.7% ADVENT'S STAKE POST-MERGER
- 11 : 295 SUVEN-TO-COHANCE SWAP RATIO
- 3 MODALITIES: SMALL MOL, ADC, OLIGO
The structure in one view: one owner, two companies, merged into a single listed CDMO paid for in shares. Sources: scheme of amalgamation.
DEAL RADAR
The numbers
| Indicator | Figure |
|---|---|
| Sponsor | Advent International (Boston), $90B+ AUM. India led by Shweta Jalan and Pankaj Patwari |
| Surviving entity | Suven Pharmaceuticals (NSE: SUVENPHA), Hyderabad. Listed CDMO, renamed Cohance Lifesciences after the merger |
| Merging entity | Cohance Lifesciences, previously private and held by Advent. API and specialty chemicals, 7 sites, ~$154M |
| The structure | A scheme of amalgamation: Cohance merged into Suven, all in shares. No cash, because Advent owned both sides |
| Swap ratio | 11 Suven shares for every 295 Cohance shares, set by independent valuers PwC and BDO |
| Post-merger | Advent 66.7%, public 33.3% before ESOP dilution. Combined value ~$3 billion |
| Advent's entry | December 2022: ₹ 6,313 crore for 50.1% of Suven at ₹ 495, plus an open offer for 26% more |
| The votes | November 28, 2024: Suven 99.9994% and Cohance 99.967% in favour |
| The path | NCLT sanction Mar 27, 2025; Department of Pharmaceuticals approval Apr 22; effective May 1, 2025 |
| The platform | Three modalities: small molecules, antibody-drug conjugates (via NJ Bio) and oligonucleotides (via Sapala) |
| The bolt-ons | NJ Bio, a US ADC/XDC business, for ~$100M; and Sapala Organics for oligonucleotide technology |
| FY26 financials | Revenue ₹ 2,268 crore, down 13%; adjusted EBITDA ₹ 480 crore at a 21% margin. Management calls it a trough year |
| Q1 FY27 | Revenue ₹ 422.3 crore, down 23%; adjusted EBITDA margin just 2.2%, dragged by NJ Bio losses. Net cash ₹ 251 crore |
| The wobbles | Chairman changed mid-FY26; CFO resigned Sep 2026; Jefferies downgraded to Underperform with a ₹ 300 target |
| Status (Sep 16, 2026) | Completed, operating as Cohance Lifesciences. Chairman Umang Vohra; recovery guided for H2 FY27 |
A plan years in the making: buy the listed company in 2022, merge in the private one in 2025, then keep building. Sources: Advent, Suven filings.
What actually happened. Hyderabad and Boston, 2022 to 2026
- A sponsor bought a listed shell, then filled it with its own private asset. When Advent took control of Suven in 2022, the merger with Cohance was already the plan. A listed company gives a sponsor a public currency, tradable shares, and a ready vehicle to consolidate into. Merging in a private portfolio company it also owned turned two sub-scale businesses into one listed platform, without an auction, a buyer or a cash outlay.
- Why that matters: this is a distinct PE playbook. Rather than exit two assets separately at sub-scale multiples, a sponsor combines them inside a listed vehicle to create something larger and more valuable, and keeps control of the result.
- The whole negotiation was the swap ratio, because there was no cash. With Advent on both sides, the merger could not be a price negotiation; it was an exchange of shares at a ratio. That ratio, 11 Suven for 295 Cohance, decides how the combined company is split between the two shareholder bases, so independent valuers set it and the court blessed it to protect Suven's public minority. When one owner merges its own companies, fairness of the ratio is the only real question.
- The platform kept expanding after the merger, into complex, higher-margin work. The merged company did not stop. It bought NJ Bio in the US for antibody-drug conjugate capability and Sapala for oligonucleotides, extending from ordinary small-molecule work into the complex modalities that command premium margins and where leaders like Lonza compete. The merger built the base; the bolt-ons are the ambition.
- In plain terms, a CDMO: a contract development and manufacturing organisation, a company that makes drugs and drug ingredients for other pharmaceutical firms. The complex modalities, ADCs and oligonucleotides, are harder to make and so earn higher margins than standard chemistry.
Why it matters to you. Three portable lessons. If you advise a sponsor holding several assets in one sector: merging them inside a listed vehicle can create a platform worth more than the parts sold separately, and keeps a public currency for future deals. If you advise a listed company's minority in a related-party merger: the swap ratio is everything, so the independence of the valuers is what protects you. And if you back a buy-and-build platform: the assembly is the easy, visible part, and the integration and the numbers are where these deals are actually proven, sometimes years later.
FEATURED DEAL
The merger with no buyer: how a sponsor combines two companies it already owns
Real deal, merger announced February 29, 2024; effective May 1, 2025; integration ongoing through FY27. Figures from Suven and Cohance filings, the NCLT order and verified media. Not investment advice.
First, what makes it unusual
- There was no buyer and no seller. Advent already owned controlling stakes in both Suven and Cohance, so the merger was between two companies under the same roof.
- No cash moved. Cohance's shareholders, chiefly Advent, received new Suven shares instead of money, at a ratio fixed in advance.
- And the deal could not be blocked on price, only on fairness, because the only variable was how many Suven shares each Cohance share converted into.
The three-part answer
- A share swap replaces cash when the same owner is on both sides. Because Advent controlled both, paying cash for one with the other would just move money within its own portfolio. Issuing Suven shares to Cohance's holders instead combines the businesses and re-slices the ownership without spending anything. When common ownership sits on both sides, a swap is the natural structure, and the ratio does the work a price would.
- The swap ratio is the entire deal, so a third party has to set it. At 11 Suven for 295 Cohance, the ratio determines what share of the combined company each side ends up with. Because Advent benefits whichever way it tilts, it cannot set it credibly itself, so independent valuers PwC and BDO fixed it and a fairness opinion backed it. In a related-party merger the valuers are not a formality; they are the only thing between the sponsor and the public minority.
- The listing is the point, not an incidental. Advent could have merged the two privately, but keeping the combined company listed as Suven gives it a public currency and a market valuation, which is what let the platform later raise capital for NJ Bio and Sapala. Merging a private asset into a listed one, rather than the reverse, is a deliberate choice to inherit a stock-market presence, worth more than the mechanics suggest.
A merger paid entirely in shares: 295 Cohance shares became 11 Suven shares, and Advent ended at 66.7%. Sources: scheme of amalgamation, NCLT order.
The signal most briefs miss. When a sponsor merges two companies it owns, ask one question: was the swap ratio fair to the minority of the listed company? Everything else is mechanics. Advent captured value by combining its own assets, which is legitimate, but the public shareholders of Suven could only be protected by an independent, defensible ratio, which is why PwC and BDO and a fairness opinion sat at the centre of the deal. In any related-party merger, read the valuation report before the press release, because the ratio is where the interests actually collide.
SECTOR SIGNAL
Three things this deal confirms about Indian pharma manufacturing and private equity
What the merger builds: one platform spanning small molecules, antibody-drug conjugates and oligonucleotides. Sources: investor presentation.
- India's contract drug manufacturing is consolidating into scaled platforms. India's CDMO sector is among the fastest-growing globally, lifted by China-plus-one supply shifts and rising pharma outsourcing. But individual Indian players are small against Lonza, WuXi and Samsung Biologics, so the value is in combining them into platforms with real scale, which is exactly what merging Suven and Cohance does. Expect more consolidation as Indian CDMOs chase global relevance.
- Private equity is building listed platforms, not just buying and flipping. Advent's move, buy a listed company, merge in a private one, then bolt on more, is a platform-building playbook, not a quick trade. As Indian sectors mature, sponsors increasingly assemble scaled, listed businesses over multiple years rather than acquiring and exiting single assets, because the combined platform commands a valuation neither piece could alone.
- The complex modalities are where the margins and the risk both sit. The platform is pushing beyond ordinary chemistry into antibody-drug conjugates and oligonucleotides, which earn premium margins but are harder to make and slower to ramp. NJ Bio, the ADC business, is losing money early on. The bet on complexity is where the upside is, and also where the execution risk concentrates, so these deals are judged on the ramp, not the acquisition.
The merger was the base; NJ Bio and Sapala are the buy-and-build on top, reaching into complex biologics. Sources: investor presentation.
Signal for advisors: Two conversations this week. Any sponsor holding several sub-scale assets in a consolidating sector: a listed-vehicle roll-up can create a platform worth more than the sum of separate exits, and Suven-Cohance is the comp. And any client evaluating a CDMO or specialty-manufacturing platform: judge it on the ramp of the complex, high-margin modalities, because that is where the thesis is won, and where the early losses show up first.
VALUATION PULSE
Is a ~$3 billion CDMO platform worth it? Three ways to judge it, honestly
| Way to measure it | What it says here |
|---|---|
| Price against the current numbers | On FY26 revenue of ₹ 2,268 crore, down 13%, and a 21% EBITDA margin, a ~$3 billion value looks rich, and it got richer as Q1 FY27 revenue fell another 23% with margins near 2%. On today's numbers alone, the platform is expensive and the trend is wrong. |
| Price against the ambition | Management targets $1 billion of revenue in five years, which would place it among the top 20 global CDMOs. If the complex modalities ramp and the destocking passes, the value is a bet on that future, not on FY26. The multiple only makes sense if the recovery arrives. |
| Price against building it | A platform spanning small molecules, ADCs and oligonucleotides across a dozen sites cannot be assembled quickly, and those capabilities are scarce. The value is in the breadth and the scarce capability, which is real, even as the current earnings are not yet there to support it. |
The honest picture: revenue fell in the first years after the merger, on destocking and early losses in the newly acquired ADC business. Sources: company results.
- What a 'trough year' means: a low point management expects the business to climb out of. FY26 and early FY27 revenue fell on customer destocking and losses at the newly bought NJ Bio, and the company guides recovery from H2 FY27, so the current numbers are meant to understate the platform's potential, if you believe the guidance.
The discipline. Judge this one on the recovery, and be honest that it has not arrived. The whole ~$3 billion thesis rests on complex-modality growth and a rebound from the destocking trough, and so far the numbers have gone the wrong way: revenue down 13% then 23%, EBITDA margin collapsing to 2.2%, a chairman changed, a CFO resigned, Jefferies at Underperform. None of that is fatal for a platform still being assembled, but none is proof the thesis is working either. This is a deal to watch, not to conclude on, and the honest verdict today is: ambitious, expensive, unproven.
This issue. Watch three things. The recovery: management guides a rebound from H2 FY27, so the next two quarters are the test of whether FY26 was truly a trough or a slide. The NJ Bio ramp: the $100M ADC acquisition is losing money and has to scale to justify itself, so its quarterly EBITDA is the single number that matters most. And the stability: a chairman change, a CFO resignation and an analyst downgrade inside a year are a lot of turbulence for a platform that still has to execute a complex, multi-site integration.
DEAL STRUCTURE CLINIC
The related-party share swap, and why the valuers matter more than the price
In plain terms, a related-party merger: A merger between two companies controlled by the same owner. Because that owner sits on both sides, it has an incentive to set the terms in its own favour, so the law requires independent valuation and, for a listed company, protection of the minority shareholders who do not share that control.
In plain terms, a swap ratio: The fixed exchange rate at which one company's shares convert into the other's in a merger. Here every 295 Cohance shares became 11 Suven shares. The ratio, not any price, determines how the combined company's ownership is divided.
Three mechanics this deal showcases
The logic of the structure: two sub-scale companies sold separately are worth less than one integrated, listed platform. Sources: Advent, Suven filings.
- A swap conserves cash and re-slices ownership. Because no money changes hands, a share-swap merger lets a sponsor combine businesses without funding a purchase, and the ratio simply redraws who owns what. When the same owner controls both companies, this beats a cash sale, which would only shuffle money within the portfolio. The structure fits the ownership.
- Independent valuers replace the missing counterparty. In an arm's-length deal, buyer and seller negotiate and each protects its own interest. Here there was no opposing party, so PwC valued one side and BDO the other, and a fairness opinion and the NCLT stood in for the negotiation that could not happen. In a related-party merger, the valuers are the counterparty, which is why their independence is the whole safeguard.
- The listing is a strategic asset in its own right. Advent merged the private company into the listed one, not the other way round, so the combined entity kept Suven's stock-market listing. That listing is a public currency the platform can use to raise capital and pay for acquisitions, which is exactly how it funded its later bolt-ons. When you choose which entity survives a merger, you are choosing which advantages the combined company inherits.
M&A 101
Building a listed platform from your own portfolio: the three-step playbook
In plain terms, a platform roll-up inside a portfolio: A sponsor that owns several companies in one sector combines them, often into a listed vehicle, to create a single larger business. The pieces are assets the sponsor already controls, so the work is integration and value creation, not acquisition.
The three steps, using this deal
- Step 1: Acquire a listed anchor for its currency. A listed company gives you tradable shares and a public valuation, both of which private assets lack. Advent bought control of listed Suven in 2022 with the merger already planned, so the combined platform would be public. When you intend to build by acquisition, owning a listed anchor first gives you the currency to pay with.
- Step 2: Merge in your private assets by swap, and get the ratio blessed. Combine the companies you already own using share swaps rather than cash, and, because you are on both sides, have independent valuers set the ratio and a court protect the minority. Advent merged Cohance into Suven at a valuer-set ratio approved by ~100% of both shareholder bases. Do the fairness properly, because a related-party merger lives or dies on the credibility of the ratio.
- Step 3: Bolt on capability, then prove the integration. With the platform listed and scaled, add the capabilities you lack, Advent bought NJ Bio for ADCs and Sapala for oligonucleotides, then do the hard part: make the combined thing actually work. The assembly is fast and visible; the integration is slow and is where the return is truly earned, often after the headlines have moved on.
Assembled, ambitious and unproven: the platform is built, but a trough and management churn mean the thesis is not yet demonstrated. Sources: Q1 FY27 results, Jefferies.
Read this before you build a platform from your own portfolio. Three things decide whether it works: whether your listed anchor gives you a currency worth having, whether the swap ratios are fair enough to survive scrutiny, and whether you can integrate what you assemble rather than just stack it up. Advent has done the first two cleanly and is still in the middle of the third, with a trough year, a downgrade and management churn to work through. The platform exists; whether it becomes a global CDMO is a question the next two years, not this deal, will answer. Not investment advice.
LIVE MANDATE
ACTIVE BUYER BRIEF · KPE-2026-001 · REPLY TO REFER
We are looking for a textile manufacturing business in Maharashtra or Gujarat.
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Sector | Textile manufacturing: yarn, fabric, garments, or processing units |
| Deal type | Full acquisition or majority stake |
| Geography | Maharashtra and Gujarat |
| Revenue | ₹ 1 Cr to ₹ 25 Cr. At least 20% operating margin. Revenue discussed privately after the first fit check. |
| Exclusions | No D2C brands. No consumer retail or e-commerce. |
| How to refer | WhatsApp the CA Ambassador Group or email hello@kautilya-pe.com. A short message is enough. No formal report needed. |
Advent, which owned both companies, merged the private Cohance into the listed Suven Pharmaceuticals through a scheme of amalgamation paid entirely in shares. The merger was announced in February 2024 and took effect on May 1, 2025. Suven was then renamed Cohance Lifesciences, with Advent holding 66.7% and the public 33.3%.
The ratio was 11 Suven shares for every 295 Cohance shares. It was set by independent valuers PwC and BDO and backed by a fairness opinion, because Advent sat on both sides of the deal and could not credibly set it itself.
Advent controlled both companies, so paying cash for one with the other would only have moved money within its own portfolio. Cohance's shareholders received new Suven shares instead, which combined the businesses and re-sliced ownership without spending anything.
Keeping the combined company listed as Suven gave it a public currency and a market valuation, which is what let the platform later pay for NJ Bio and Sapala Organics. Choosing which entity survives a merger decides which advantages the combined company inherits.
Not yet well. FY26 revenue was ₹ 2,268 crore, down 13%, with adjusted EBITDA of ₹ 480 crore at a 21% margin. Q1 FY27 revenue was ₹ 422.3 crore, down 23%, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 2.2%, dragged by NJ Bio losses. Management calls FY26 a trough year and guides recovery from H2 FY27.
Sources: Suven Pharmaceuticals exchange filing and release (Feb 29, 2024) · NCLT Mumbai order (Mar 27, 2025) · Department of Pharmaceuticals approval (Apr 22, 2025) · Cohance FY26 results (May 2026) and Q1 FY27 results (Aug 5, 2026) · SEBI Reg 30 filing (Sep 13, 2026) · Bar & Bench · Business Standard · FiercePharma · Jefferies (via ScanX). Dollar figures use the sources' own conversions. The ~$3 billion combined value is press-reported; the pre-merger standalone revenues and the Jefferies downgrade are press-sourced. FY25 combined revenue in the chart is approximate, shown for trend only. One outlet cited the swap as 11:259; five sources confirm 11:295, treated as the correct figure.
The India Deal Sheet is published every Wednesday and Saturday. Analysis is for informational purposes. Not investment advice. Unsubscribe · kautilya-pe.com · Mumbai
Ready to start a conversation? 20 minutes. One call. No commitment.
Read More TeardownsSubscribe on Beehiiv